- #Webroot antivirus 2016 review full#
- #Webroot antivirus 2016 review android#
- #Webroot antivirus 2016 review software#
- #Webroot antivirus 2016 review Pc#
Second-place finisher Kaspersky Anti-Virus was 16 seconds behind. (McAfee AntiVirus Plus slowed the system the most, with a 44 percent hit.)īitdefender's Quick Scan easily led the pack in least system impact, letting the OpenOffice test complete in 6:58, only 1 percent longer than the baseline.
#Webroot antivirus 2016 review full#
That puts Bitdefender into a virtual tie with Panda Antivirus Pro 2016 as having the least impact on performance during a full scan. But Bitdefender's QuickScan was the fastest we've seen, looking at 3,390 key files in just 5 seconds.Īntivirus Plus 2016 completed our OpenOffice benchmark test in 7 minutes and 48 seconds during a full scan, a 13 percent slowdown from the baseline, which might not be noticeable during regular computer tasks. Overall, Bitdefender's full-scan time was in the middle of the pack - significantly slower than Kaspersky Anti-Virus' full scan, which took only 3.5 minutes, but well ahead of Avast Pro AntiVirus' seemingly interminable scans of more than an hour. The other million or so files were presumed to be safe, and ignoring them helps quicken the pace. After an initial full scan that took 60 minutes and 25 seconds to examine 1,560,493 files, Bitdefender Antivirus Plus 2016 settled down to an average scan time of 25 minutes and 31 seconds, looking at 528,800 files. It was also one of the fastest programs to scan our Asus test system.
#Webroot antivirus 2016 review software#
Bitdefender Antivirus Plus 2016 had no passive effect on performance at all, with our OpenOffice benchmark taking 6 minutes and 53 seconds to complete its tasks - the same as before the software was installed.īitdefender has something few antivirus makers yet offer: a way to safeguard your system from encrypting ransomware. We timed how long it took to run quick and full malware scans, then ran those scans concurrently with the OpenOffice test to see how much longer it took the benchmark to complete. We used our custom OpenOffice benchmark test, which matches 20,000 names and addresses in a spreadsheet, to measure system performance before and after Antivirus Plus 2016 was installed. We installed Bitdefender Antivirus Plus 2016 on a Windows 8.1-based Asus X555LA notebook with an Intel Core i3 processor, 6GB of RAM and a 500GB hard drive containing 36GB of assorted files. The payoff is one of the best performance scores in the basic-security-software arena. But it does have the company's Photon performance technology, which streamlines operations during malware scans.
#Webroot antivirus 2016 review Pc#
Performance and System ImpactĪntivirus Plus 2016 lacks Bitdefender's PC Optimizer, which comes with the more expensive Total Security suite and can also be bought as a $60 add-on. But the rescue partition won't work with PCs that use Microsoft's Secure Boot - for those systems, you'll need to download the company's Rescue CD software and burn it to an optical disc or USB stick.
If your system is so gunked up with malware that it can barely be used, Bitdefender Antivirus Plus 2016 has you covered.ĭuring installation, it puts a hidden "rescue" partition on your hard drive that can boot and clean the PC.
#Webroot antivirus 2016 review android#
Nor does it have the dedicated webcam protection found in mid- and high-range Kaspersky products, which often also include licenses for the best Mac antivirus software and the best Android antivirus apps.īitdefender's file shredder can obliterate any compromising or sensitive material, but doesn't use U.S.
It screens Web links in emails, Web browsers and instant messages, but Bitdefender Antivirus Plus 2016 lacks specific protection against potentially unwanted applications, such as adware or browser hijackers.
0 kommentar(er)
